5 answers
5 answers
Updated
Michelle’s Answer
Hi, Jazzy !
I love this question and strangely enough, I think I know what you're asking when you ask what is better acting or being in theatre ! I hope my understanding of your question may give some insight.
Since I am an actor and have also worked "in theatre" and have a true love for acting as well as professional theatre, I have to say for me, just for me, acting is better. I have been a theatre professional doing different facets in theatre and I do prefer on stage or in front of the camera as opposed to administrative or tech work. One is not better than the other, it's more like a preference. Being an actor or a theatre technician or in management is very exciting, demanding and creative, so the two careers have some of the same elements but many people like being backstage doing costuming, make up, lighting, sound, scenery, stage management, box office management and many other positions that I am sure I'm leaving out here.
If you start acting, it's best to start in theatre but you can transition to film very easily with training. Actors are expected to be able to perform in all media so it's not which medium is "better" it's all focused on acting and as an actor, one obtains work in television, film, theatre, video and web based podcasts or commercials and even print sometimes. Other places that actors work are in nightclubs when doing stand up comedy and improvisation shows and on the street when doing street theatre at a tourist landmark or anywhere. So, acting is what one does and Theatre is the building it happens in.
No one can tell you what the experience would be like for you. You'll have to find out by working on shows and videos at your school or in college. That is when you'd be able to figure out if you like the business or tech end of theatre or if you prefer acting.
Oh, this question changed since I sent this advice. Okay. I would imagine that some of what I've explained stands true for this question as well. It all boils down to being an actor and adapting to various work situations. Both stage and screen are indeed equally exciting and fulfilling. One is not better than the other. You also have to keep in mind that being an actor is not determined by what medium you want or choose to work in, you must be able to do it all.
I hope this helps !
I love this question and strangely enough, I think I know what you're asking when you ask what is better acting or being in theatre ! I hope my understanding of your question may give some insight.
Since I am an actor and have also worked "in theatre" and have a true love for acting as well as professional theatre, I have to say for me, just for me, acting is better. I have been a theatre professional doing different facets in theatre and I do prefer on stage or in front of the camera as opposed to administrative or tech work. One is not better than the other, it's more like a preference. Being an actor or a theatre technician or in management is very exciting, demanding and creative, so the two careers have some of the same elements but many people like being backstage doing costuming, make up, lighting, sound, scenery, stage management, box office management and many other positions that I am sure I'm leaving out here.
If you start acting, it's best to start in theatre but you can transition to film very easily with training. Actors are expected to be able to perform in all media so it's not which medium is "better" it's all focused on acting and as an actor, one obtains work in television, film, theatre, video and web based podcasts or commercials and even print sometimes. Other places that actors work are in nightclubs when doing stand up comedy and improvisation shows and on the street when doing street theatre at a tourist landmark or anywhere. So, acting is what one does and Theatre is the building it happens in.
No one can tell you what the experience would be like for you. You'll have to find out by working on shows and videos at your school or in college. That is when you'd be able to figure out if you like the business or tech end of theatre or if you prefer acting.
Oh, this question changed since I sent this advice. Okay. I would imagine that some of what I've explained stands true for this question as well. It all boils down to being an actor and adapting to various work situations. Both stage and screen are indeed equally exciting and fulfilling. One is not better than the other. You also have to keep in mind that being an actor is not determined by what medium you want or choose to work in, you must be able to do it all.
I hope this helps !
Updated
Martha’s Answer
Hi Jazzy,
I am not sure exactly what you are asking since actors also work in the theater. Do you mean acting in films versus acting in theater? If so, I have put links to two articles below that compare the two types of acting. Theater acting gives you contact with a live audience and the chance for repeat performances. Film acting allows for more subtle work because the camera could get closer. Both are challenging and rewarding. It just depends upon what you want. Some actors - such as Meryl Streep, Denzel Washington, Daniel Radcliffe, and Viola Davis - have successful careers in both.
Remember also that there are terrific jobs behind the scenes in both media, such as stage management, props, camera work, special effects, and make-up. While you don't get the face recognition in these roles, you do have the team work, camaraderie, and chance for professional awards.
Good luck!
Backstage - https://www.backstage.com/magazine/article/major-differences-stage-screen-acting-13449/
Actor's studio - https://tbellactorsstudio.com/blog/how-do-film-acting-and-theater-acting-differ/
I am not sure exactly what you are asking since actors also work in the theater. Do you mean acting in films versus acting in theater? If so, I have put links to two articles below that compare the two types of acting. Theater acting gives you contact with a live audience and the chance for repeat performances. Film acting allows for more subtle work because the camera could get closer. Both are challenging and rewarding. It just depends upon what you want. Some actors - such as Meryl Streep, Denzel Washington, Daniel Radcliffe, and Viola Davis - have successful careers in both.
Remember also that there are terrific jobs behind the scenes in both media, such as stage management, props, camera work, special effects, and make-up. While you don't get the face recognition in these roles, you do have the team work, camaraderie, and chance for professional awards.
Good luck!
Martha recommends the following next steps:
I just edited it. Thanks for the advice!
Jazzy
That clarifies it - thank you.
Martha Kramer
Updated
Ami’s Answer
If acting sets your heart on fire, there's no need to pick one over the other. Both fields offer fantastic chances to enjoy yourself while earning a living. Your main factor to consider should be your geographical location, or where you'd like to be based. If you're in LA, you'll likely find more opportunities in film, TV, or commercials. If you're based in NY, theatre might be a more practical option. But remember, both these markets are fiercely competitive, so you'll need to shine with talent, good looks, or unique skills. If you're located in a secondary market like Atlanta, Chicago, or Wilmington, don't limit yourself to just one field. If your heart is set on theatre, I'd recommend getting involved in backstage work whenever you can if you don't land a role. This will equip you with a valuable skill set that can help you secure paid roles in the industry you adore. Neither acting in Film or Theatre is a full time/permanent gig - since they are BOTH set around projects with a set time limit, or run. So you could always do one, then do the other... and really see which one you like more. They are both so different, but know you don't have to JUST choose one path when it comes to acting! There is commercial acting, voice acting, web series, podcasts... so many options for actors. Stay versatile and you will always have work. Good luck!
Updated
Chinyere’s Answer
Hello Jazzy,
Interesting question! Choosing between a career in film or theater depends on what you find most rewarding and enjoyable, as each offers different experiences and benefits.
Film:
- Reach and Impact: Films can reach a global audience, and your work can be seen by millions of people across the world.
- Financial Rewards: Film roles often pay more than theater roles, especially if you land a leading role in a big production or become part of a successful franchise.
- Production and Schedule: Filming schedules can be intense, but are typically shorter than theater runs. You may have more downtime between projects.
- Permanence: Films are recorded and can be watched over and over again, creating a lasting legacy.
Theater:
- Live Performance: Theater provides the unique thrill of performing live, with immediate audience feedback and the energy of a live crowd.
- **Consistency and Routine**: Theater actors often perform the same role over a longer period, allowing for a stable routine and deeper character exploration.
- Community and Craft: Theater tends to have a strong sense of community among the cast and crew. It's often seen as a space for honing acting skills due to its emphasis on character development and dialogue.
- Flexibility in Roles: In theater, there might be more opportunities to play a variety of roles and participate in diverse productions.
Considerations:
- Personal Preference: If you enjoy the adrenaline rush of live performance and the challenge of connecting with an audience in real-time, theater might be more rewarding.
- Career Goals: If you prefer the idea of reaching a broader audience and potentially achieving greater financial success, film might be a better fit.
Ultimately, the "better" job depends on your personal interests, goals, and what aspects of performing bring you the most joy. You could also consider a career that allows you to explore both fields!
Best wishes!
Interesting question! Choosing between a career in film or theater depends on what you find most rewarding and enjoyable, as each offers different experiences and benefits.
Film:
- Reach and Impact: Films can reach a global audience, and your work can be seen by millions of people across the world.
- Financial Rewards: Film roles often pay more than theater roles, especially if you land a leading role in a big production or become part of a successful franchise.
- Production and Schedule: Filming schedules can be intense, but are typically shorter than theater runs. You may have more downtime between projects.
- Permanence: Films are recorded and can be watched over and over again, creating a lasting legacy.
Theater:
- Live Performance: Theater provides the unique thrill of performing live, with immediate audience feedback and the energy of a live crowd.
- **Consistency and Routine**: Theater actors often perform the same role over a longer period, allowing for a stable routine and deeper character exploration.
- Community and Craft: Theater tends to have a strong sense of community among the cast and crew. It's often seen as a space for honing acting skills due to its emphasis on character development and dialogue.
- Flexibility in Roles: In theater, there might be more opportunities to play a variety of roles and participate in diverse productions.
Considerations:
- Personal Preference: If you enjoy the adrenaline rush of live performance and the challenge of connecting with an audience in real-time, theater might be more rewarding.
- Career Goals: If you prefer the idea of reaching a broader audience and potentially achieving greater financial success, film might be a better fit.
Ultimately, the "better" job depends on your personal interests, goals, and what aspects of performing bring you the most joy. You could also consider a career that allows you to explore both fields!
Best wishes!
I appreciate this, thank you for the advice.
Jazzy
You are welcome!
Chinyere Okafor
Updated
Andrés’s Answer
Surely, it's all about your perspective. Theatre has often been seen as an art form created by the less wealthy for the enjoyment of the rich, while film is perceived as a medium produced by the affluent for the entertainment of the less fortunate. This common belief offers plenty of room for interpretation. If we consider both roles as equal in a similar context, filming a scene requires multiple takes in a short time. On the other hand, theatre demands several days of rehearsal leading up to the performance day, which is only available to a select audience. All that while film lasts forever.
Thank you for the advice, Andrés.
Jazzy
Delete Comment
Flag Comment